Transparent Scoring + 6R Recommendations

Application Rationalization

Know exactly which applications to retire, replace, or modernize—and why.
Peaqview's rationalization engine analyzes 46 transparent factors to generate clear recommendations. No black box: you see exactly why each application is scored, what actions are recommended, and in what order to execute them safely.
Explore 6R Framework
Rationalization Recommendations
42
Custom HR Portal
Replace → Workday
Consider
-15
Core Banking System
Mission-Critical
Protected

The 6R Framework

Six possible actions for every application in your portfolio. Peaqview's scoring engine recommends the right one based on business value, technical health, and cost.

Retire

Retire

Decommission applications that are no longer needed. The business function is either obsolete or covered by other systems.

When: Low usage, redundant capability, high maintenance cost
Replace

Replace

Swap legacy systems for modern alternatives that better serve business needs—often SaaS solutions.

When: Outdated technology, better alternatives exist, vendor support ending
Replatform

Replatform

Move to a new platform (e.g., cloud) with minimal code changes. Lift and optimize.

When: Cloud migration, infrastructure modernization, cost optimization
Refactor

Refactor

Rebuild or significantly modify the application to leverage modern architecture and capabilities.

When: Strategic application, needs modernization, competitive advantage
Rehost

Rehost

Move as-is to new infrastructure without changes. Quick migration with minimal risk.

When: Datacenter exit, quick wins, stable applications
Retain

Retain

Keep the application as-is. Some systems don't need change—they're working fine.

When: Stable, low cost, meets requirements, no better alternative

Transparent Scoring Engine

46 named factors, clear thresholds, full auditability. You always know exactly why an application is recommended for rationalization.

0-30 pts

Eligibility

Explicit 6R decisions, EOL status, TIME classification, vendor support

0-25 pts

Readiness

Dependencies resolved, successor defined, user migration planned

0-25 pts

Strategic Fit

Functional suitability, technical health, redundancy, obsolescence score

0-20 pts

Cost Efficiency

High cost relative to business value (scaled by criticality)

0-20 pts

Urgency

Target dates, lifecycle phase-out, contract deadlines, compliance

-50 to 0

Risk Protection

Mission-critical without redundancy gets automatic protection

Recommendation Thresholds

25-49
Consider
Evaluate further before deciding
0-24
Review
More analysis needed
<0
Protected
Mission-critical, blocked from retirement

Portfolio Flow Visualization

See how your portfolio transforms over time with Sankey diagrams that show applications flowing from current state through 6R actions to target state.

Current State
Finance Apps (12)
HR Systems (8)
Marketing (5)
6R Actions
Retire (7)
Replace (5)
Replatform (4)
Retain (9)
Target State
Optimized Portfolio (18)
-28% cost | -32% apps
Real vs Scenario: Compare committed plans vs what-if analysis
Count vs Cost: View by number of apps or annual run cost
Capability Grouping: Filter by business capability level

TIME Model Integration

Strategic classification that informs—but doesn't dictate—rationalization decisions.

Tolerate

Low business value, acceptable technical health. Keep running but don't invest.

+5 eligibility points for rationalization review

Invest

High business value, good technical health. Strategic assets to enhance.

Protected from rationalization unless redundant

Migrate

High business value, poor technical health. Needs modernization.

+8 strategic fit points toward transformation

Eliminate

Low business value, poor technical health. Retire or replace.

+10 eligibility points for retirement

What-If Scenario Planning

Model different rationalization approaches, compare cost impacts, then commit when you're confident.

Plan

Planning Mode

Create hypothetical scenarios. Assign 6R actions to applications, model multi-year cost impacts. No changes to your actual portfolio.

Compare

Compare Scenarios

Evaluate multiple approaches side by side. See cost savings, risk levels, and execution complexity for each option.

Commit

Commit & Execute

When you've chosen the best approach, commit the scenario. It becomes your rationalization roadmap with tracked progress.

Safe Execution Sequencing

The engine identifies dependencies and generates a safe order for rationalization. You won't retire App A while App B still depends on it.

Wave 1
Legacy ReportingOld CRMDept. SharePoint
No blockers—can proceed now
Wave 2
HR PortalFinance Module
Blocked by Wave 1 dependencies
Wave 3
Integration Hub
Blocked until Wave 2 completes

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Peaqview's rationalization capabilities

The 6R framework (Retire, Replace, Replatform, Refactor, Rehost, Repurchase) defines the possible actions for each application in your portfolio. Peaqview's scoring engine analyzes 46 factors across eligibility, readiness, strategic fit, cost efficiency, and urgency to recommend the right 6R action for each application—with full transparency into why each recommendation was made.

Mission-critical applications without redundancy receive automatic protection (-50 risk points) that blocks them from retirement recommendations. This protection is only removed when you've explicitly set a 6R decision OR when redundancy exists (meaning the business function is covered by another system). This prevents accidental retirement of critical systems while still enabling consolidation of duplicates.

The TIME model (Tolerate, Invest, Migrate, Eliminate) is a strategic classification that informs decisions, while 6R (Retire, Replace, Replatform, Refactor, Rehost, Repurchase) specifies the actual action to take. Peaqview integrates both: TIME classification contributes to the scoring, but 6R decisions define execution. An 'Eliminate' classification suggests retirement, but you still choose whether to Retire, Replace, or Repurchase.

Fully transparent. Peaqview shows all 46 scoring factors with their point values and descriptions. For each application, you see exactly which factors contributed to the score—whether it's EOL status (+10), explicit 6R decision (+15), high cost relative to value (+5-15), or critical protection (-50). No black box, full auditability.

Yes. Each workspace can configure scoring thresholds (Recommended ≥50, Consider 25-49, Review 0-24, Protected <0), adjust factor weights, or enable/disable specific scoring categories. This lets you tune the engine to your organization's risk appetite and rationalization strategy.

Ready to Rationalize with Confidence?

See exactly which applications to retire, replace, or modernize—with transparent scoring you can trust and defend.